The duty of an agency to engage in reasoned decision-making is a hardy perennial that courts have applied for over a century.

Scholars debate whether the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making should be reconsidered.

In a conversation with The Regulatory Review, administrative and constitutional law scholar Gillian E. Metzger discusses the impact of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings on administrative law doctrine ...

In this week’s Saturday Seminar, scholars consider how the NextGen exam and alternative licensure pathways may transform ...

Although research spanning decades has linked EtO to life-altering illnesses, the Occupational Safety and Health ...

But others point to the shortcomings of the United States’ largest publicly owned power company—the Tennessee Valley ...

The corporate embrace of Bitcoin was hailed as a bold innovation in treasury management. But what if this innovation is, in ...

Although platforms have no obligation to monitor content under Section 230, the U.S. federal law recently signed by President ...

Das, a professor at the New York University School of Law, argues that U.S. immigration facilities have fallen through the ...

That future has arrived. Two thirds of health care professionals reported incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into ...

Scholars argue that the United States government should adapt to address rampant loss of regulatory body quorums.

Permitting reforms in Virginia can inspire greater efficiency and transparency in other jurisdictions.